Study on the Relationship between Urbanization and Economic Development Based on Coordinate Coupling Degree Model in Xinjiang

Muhabaiti Pareti, Zuo-Ting, Zhou-Ning

Areal Research and Development ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 19-22.

PDF(463 KB)
PDF(463 KB)
Areal Research and Development ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 19-22.

Study on the Relationship between Urbanization and Economic Development Based on Coordinate Coupling Degree Model in Xinjiang

  • Muhabaiti Pareti1, Zuo Ting1, Zhou Ning2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Urbanization is one of the important indexes of reflecting the economic development of a country or a region. For developing countries in particular, urbanization has become the primary engine to economic growth, and economic growth, in turn, provides the material guarantee for urbanization. Based on previous research, 41 index items that reflects urbanization and economic development systems are built, the weights of each index and the comprehensive level of economic development and urbanization of Xinjiang is calculated through entropy method, and the evolution of coordinated coupling degree between urbanization and economic development was analyzed by coordinate coupling degree model. Results indicate that economic scale and economic quality had a larger portion of contribution to the comprehensive level of economic development, while land urbanization and population urbanization had more effect on the comprehensive level of urbanization than that of the otheraspects of urbanization. During 1990—2014, the economic development and urbanization system has experienced low level coordination, medium level coordination, and high level coordination respectively.

Key words

urbanization / entropy method / coordinate coupling degree model / Xinjiang

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
Muhabaiti Pareti, Zuo-Ting, Zhou-Ning. Study on the Relationship between Urbanization and Economic Development Based on Coordinate Coupling Degree Model in Xinjiang[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2016, 35(3): 19-22

References

[1]邵磊，张慧，韩永强.安徽省城镇化与经济发展的关系研究[J].平顶山学院学报，2014，27（5）：112-116.

[2]保罗·贝洛克.城市与经济发展[M].肖乐福，赵长茂，鄢律，等译.南昌：江西人民出版社，1991：210-230.

[3]Northam R M.Urban Geography[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc.,1975.

[4]马远.基于面板模型的城镇化经济绩效区域分异研究——以新疆为例[J].软科学，2012，26(5)：76-81.

[5]向春玲.中国城镇化进程中的“城市病”及其治理[J].新疆师范大学学报：社会科学版，2014，35（4）：45-52.

[6]霍利斯·钱纳里.发展的模式：1950—1970[M].李新华,徐公理,迟建平，译.北京：经济科学出版社，1988：21-95.

[7]张宪平，刘靖宇.城镇化发展与县域经济增长关系的实证[J].生产力研究，2008(2)：49-51.

[8]王晓娟.兵团城镇化与经济发展相关关系的实证分析[J].兵团党校学报，2011(5)：35-41.

[9]Li Y F,Li Y,Zhou Y.Investigation of A Coupling Model of Coordination between Urbanization and the Environment[J].Environmental Management，2012，98（1）：127-133.

[10]吴耀，牛俊蜻，郝晋伟.区域城镇化综合发展水平评价研究——以陕西省为例[J].西北大学学报，2009，39(6)：1043-1049.

[11]刘耀彬，李仁东，宋学锋.中国区域城市化与生态环境耦合的关联分析[J].地理学报，2005，60（2）：237-247.

[12]廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系——以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].热带地理，1999，19(2)：171-178.

[13]张怡.南充市城镇化与经济发展的协调度研究[J].西华师范大学学报：自然科学版，2013，34(4)：370-375.

[14]董亚娟，马耀峰，李振亭，等.西安入境旅游流与城市旅游环境耦合协调关系研究[J].地域研究与开发，2013，32（1）：98-101.

[15]关伟，王宁.沈阳经济区经济与环境耦合关联分析[J].地域研究与开发，2014，33（3）：43-47.

[16]仇兵奎，张惠，高楠.武汉市城镇化与房地产发展耦合协调度分析[J].地域研究与开发，2013，34（2）：80-84.

[17]李波，张吉献.中原经济区城镇化与生态环境耦合发展时空差异研究[J].地域研究与开发，2015，34（3）：144-146.

[18]李娜，孙才志，范斐.辽宁沿海经济带城市化与水资源耦合关系分析[J].地域研究与开发，2010，24（4）：48-51.

[19]杨亮，丁金宏，郭永昌.中国社会保障与经济发展耦合协调度的时空特征分析[J].社会保障研究，2014（4）：94-102.

[20]张琰飞，朱海英.西南地区文化产业与旅游产业耦合协调度实证研究[J].地域研究与开发，2013，33（2）：16-20.

[21]帕夏古·阿不来提，孜比布拉·司马义，周玄德.吐鲁番地区城镇化与经济发展的耦合关系研究[J].干旱区资源与环境，2012，26（2）：13-18.
PDF(463 KB)

105

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉