Study on Impact of  Program of Border Areas Revitalization and Poverty Alleviation on Development of Border Tourism in Guangxi: Test Based on PSM-DID Method

WANG Yawen , LUO Shengfeng , HUANG Yanling

Areal Research and Development ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 94-99,106.

PDF(603 KB)
PDF(603 KB)
Areal Research and Development ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 94-99,106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2023.05.015

Study on Impact of  Program of Border Areas Revitalization and Poverty Alleviation on Development of Border Tourism in Guangxi: Test Based on PSM-DID Method

  • WANG Yawen1,2 , LUO Shengfeng1,3 , HUANG Yanling1,3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper used PSM-DID method to evaluate the impact and mechanism of the program of border areas revitalization and poverty alleviation on the border tourism development of Guangxi, and further explored its policy effect heterogeneity. The results show that: (1) The policy has significantly promoted the border tourism development, and robustness analysis further confirms the above conclusion. (2) The policy promotes the border tourism development by promoting regional economic development, increasing tourism investment, and improving the living standards of urban residents. (3) The promoting effect will be different due to the population size and transportation development, and the larger the population size and the more convenient the transportation in border counties, the smaller the promotion effect on the tourism development. 

Key words

Program of Border Areas Revitalization and Poverty Alleviation / border tourism / policy effect evaluation / PSM-DID / Guangxi

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
WANG Yawen , LUO Shengfeng , HUANG Yanling. Study on Impact of  Program of Border Areas Revitalization and Poverty Alleviation on Development of Border Tourism in Guangxi: Test Based on PSM-DID Method[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2023, 42(5): 94-99,106 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2023.05.015

References

［1］中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要［EB/OL］.（2021-03-13）［2022-09-26］.https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm.
［2］王飞,严涛.评估兴边富民行动的实施效果:以内蒙古边境旗市为例的时间序列分析［J］.贵州民族研究,2011,32(4):146-152.
［3］张丽君,赵钱,巩蓉蓉.兴边富民行动20年政策实施效果评价及展望研究:基于陆地边境140个县域经济的调查［J］.中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,47(6):94-107.
［4］吴本健,王蕾,覃梓文.兴边富民行动与边疆民族地区多维贫困的缓解［J］.中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,47(6):108-122.
［5］拓俊杰.中国“兴边富民”行动20载研究回溯与展望:基于知识图谱的可视化分析［J］.内蒙古社会科学,2021,42(4):204-212.
［6］朱玉福.兴边富民行动10周年:成就、经验及对策［J］.广西民族研究,2011(1):161-168.
［7］张遥.内蒙古实施兴边富民行动的成效、存在的问题及对策建议［J］.内蒙古社会科学,2021,42(6):194-200.
［8］王飞.兴边富民行动群众满意度评估:基于内蒙古额尔古纳市的问卷调查［J］.开发研究,2013(4):152-156.
［9］陈建樾.制度保证与经济发展:兴边富民行动在新时代的升级路径［J］.中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,47(2):12-20.
［10］李俊清,谢星全.“兴边富民行动”政策实施绩效评价:基于广西的实证考察［J］.广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,44(2):144-158.
［11］韩璐,明庆忠.边境民族文化旅游:内涵、特征与驱动机制［J］.广西民族研究,2016(5):139-148.
［12］孟爱云,耿进娜,刘英昀.中国陆路边境旅游地的旅游流模式及其驱动因素［J］.地域研究与开发,2022,41(3):101-105.
［13］郭向阳,明庆忠,穆学青,等.云南省边境地区州市旅游竞争力差异与整合研究［J］.世界地理研究,2017,26(5):147-156.
［14］李云涛,陶犁.基于地理探测器的云南省边境州市旅游发展水平空间分异及影响因素分析［J］.世界地理研究,2022,31(3):624-636.
［15］张生瑞,王英杰,鞠洪润,等.中国陆地边境旅游发展区域差异及其影响因素［J］.地理研究,2020,39(2):414-429.
［16］史鹏飞,明庆忠,韩剑磊,等.基于PMC指数模型的边境旅游政策综合量化评价与比较研究:来自广西和内蒙古两个自治区的案例［J］.地域研究与开发,2020,39(6):91-97.
［17］王桀,张琴悦.“一带一路”倡议对中国边境旅游经济空间的影响研究［J］.资源开发与市场,2021,37(6):761-768.
［18］李飞.跨境旅游合作区:探索中的边境旅游发展新模式［J］.旅游科学,2013,27(5):10-21.
［19］郑权,于善波.“一带一路”背景下中俄赫哲族—那乃族多维度旅游走廊构建研究［J］.黑龙江民族丛刊,2022(1):71-75.
［20］罗盛锋,孟淑云,黄燕玲.兴边富民行动对边境地区旅游经济发展的影响评估:以广西防城港市为例［J］.河池学院学报,2021,41(6):90-99.
［21］韩磊,朱信凯.税收结构与人口构成对居民储蓄的影响研究:基于1998—2009年省级面板数据的实证分析［J］.江汉论坛,2013(1):39-43.
［22］荣浩,王菁华.我国旅游业发展的区域差异:基于制度供给质量视角［J］.经济问题,2011(11):126-129.
［23］BERNINI C,FANG R.Living Standard and Chinese Tourism Participation［J］.International Journal of Tourism Research,2021,23(3):287-300.
［24］WANG L,FANG B,LAW R.Effect of Air Quality in the Place of Origin on Outbound Tourism Demand:Disposable Income as a Moderator［J］.Tourism Management,2018,68:152-161.
［25］沈春苗,郑江淮.环境规制如何影响了制造企业的成本加成率［J］.经济理论与经济管理,2022,42(4):27-39.
［26］赵磊,方成,毛聪玲.中国存在旅游导向型城镇化吗?基于线性和非线性的实证分析［J］.旅游科学,2016,30(6):22-38.
［27］何芙蓉,胡北明.“一带一路”倡议对我国沿线省份旅游高质量发展影响效应评估:基于DID模型的实证分析［J］.经济体制改革,2020(3):46-52.
［28］张应武,郑雪梅.离境退税政策的入境旅游效应及其内在机制［J］.地域研究与开发,2023,42(3):104-109.
［29］YAMAKA W,ZHANG X,MANEEJUK P.Analyzing the Influence of Transportations on Chinese Inbound Tourism: Markov Switching Penalized Regression Approaches［J/OL］.Mathematics,2021,9(5):515［2022-09-06］.https://doi.org/10.3390/math9050515.
［30］曹萍萍,徐晓红,李壮壮.中国数字经济发展的区域差异及空间收敛趋势［J］.统计与决策,2022,38(3):22-27.
［31］石建中,温婷.中国城市群旅游网络化社会资本分异研究［J］.地域研究与开发,2021,40(2):74-79.
［32］宋德勇,朱文博,王班班,等.企业集团内部是否存在“污染避难所”［J］.中国工业经济,2021(10):156-174.
［33］李光勤,胡志高,曹建华.制度变迁与旅游经济增长:基于双重差分方法的“局改委”政策评估［J］.旅游学刊,2018,33(1):13-24.
［34］FABER B,GAUBERT C.Tourism and Economic Development:Evidence from Mexico’s Coastline［J］.American Economic Review,2019,109(6):2245-2293.
［35］WENG J,XIAO J,YU L.Local Demand,Quality of Place,and Urban Tourism Competitiveness［J］.Frontiers in Psychology,2022,12:817805［2022-09-06］.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.817805.
［36］李如友,黄常州.中国交通基础设施对区域旅游发展的影响研究:基于门槛回归模型的证据［J］.旅游科学,2015,29(2):1-13.
［37］孔令章,李金叶.高铁开通、网络中心性与旅游经济发展［J］.产业经济研究,2021(5):113-127.
PDF(603 KB)

111

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉