Satisfaction Analysis of Rural Homestead Improvement Based on Farmers’ Livelihood Assets: A Case of Yueyang City in Hunan Province

LUO Huping , LI Yating , ZHENG Peng , GU Rui

Areal Research and Development ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2) : 175-180.

PDF(526 KB)
PDF(526 KB)
Areal Research and Development ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2) : 175-180. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2024.02.026

Satisfaction Analysis of Rural Homestead Improvement Based on Farmers’ Livelihood Assets: A Case of Yueyang City in Hunan Province

  • LUO Huping1 , LI Yating1 , ZHENG Peng2 , GU Rui3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Based on 407 samples of micro-farmers’ field research data in Yueyang City, an ordered discrete Probit model is applied to empirically test the degree of influence of livelihood capital on farmers’ satisfaction with homestead remediation and the differential effect pattern of different asset structures. The results show that :(1) Farmers’ physical capital, human capital, financial capital, social capital and natural capital all have a significant effect on farmers’ satisfaction with homestead remediation, and their stronger effects are mainly the number of family cadres, main sources of income, neighborhood relations, number of family members, total family size and distance of cultivated land， etc. (2) Farmers with different asset types show different satisfaction results on the behavior of homestead remediation, and farmers with reasonable asset types have higher satisfaction. (3) Among the factors influencing the satisfaction of farmers with different capital types, the capital rational type of farmers preferred the improvement of social capital and human capital brought about by homestead remediation, while the capital-deficient type of farmers preferred the improvement of financial capital, natural capital and physical capital.

Key words

homestead land improvement / livelihood assets / ordered Probit model / farmers’ satisfaction / Yueyang City

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
LUO Huping , LI Yating , ZHENG Peng , GU Rui. Satisfaction Analysis of Rural Homestead Improvement Based on Farmers’ Livelihood Assets: A Case of Yueyang City in Hunan Province[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2024, 43(2): 175-180 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2024.02.026

References

［1］欧阳安蛟,蔡锋铭,陈立定.农村宅基地退出机制建立探讨［J］.中国土地科学,2009,23(10):26-30.
［2］周静.农村闲置宅基地盘活利用的意愿、障碍及其改革重点分析［J］.华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(6):145-154.
［3］张佰林,张凤荣,曲衍波,等.宅基地退出与再利用研究热点与展望［J］.资源科学,2021,43(7):1277-1292.
［4］吴郁玲,于亿亿,王梅.农户对宅基地退出的福利增进需求研究：基于余江、金寨、宜城三地的农户调查［J］.中国土地科学,2021,35(7):61-70.
［5］李敏,冯月,唐鹏.农村宅基地退出农户满意度影响因素研究：基于四川省典型地区的调研数据［J］.西部论坛,2019,29(5):45-54.
［6］付文凤,郭杰,欧名豪,等.成本效益、政策认知与农村居民点整理农户补偿满意度研究［J］.中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(5):138-145.
［7］张慧利,夏显力.风险感知、制度信任与农户宅基地退出行为［J］.西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(1):145-154.
［8］罗湖平.宅基地“三权分置”改革的农户响应程度及其影响因素：浏阳市实证［J］.经济地理,2021,41(8):187-194.
［9］王俊龙,郭贯成,韩述.基于阿马蒂亚·森可行能力的农户宅基地流转意愿研究［J］.干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(2):48-54.
［10］杨玉珍.农户闲置宅基地退出的影响因素及政策衔接：行为经济学视角［J］.经济地理,2015,35(7):140-147.
［11］瞿理铜,秦琴.长沙市城市居民宅基地转入意愿及影响因素［J］.地域研究与开发,2017,36(2):118-121.
［12］吴泽斌,吴立珺.农民家庭发展能力与宅基地退出模式双边匹配研究［J］.农业技术经济,2020(7):93-105.
［13］郭贯成,陈盈蒙.家庭生命周期与农户宅基地退出意愿［J］.华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(4):23-33.
［14］关江华,黄朝禧,胡银根.农户宅基地流转意愿差异及其驱动力研究：基于农户可持续生计视角［J］.资源科学,2013,35(11):2266-2272.
［15］王静,朱琳.基于可持续生计分析框架的农户宅基地流转意愿研究［J］.中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(6):165-170.
［16］刘爽,刘静.农户分化对宅基地退出意愿的影响：来自云南省陆良县的观察［J］.中国农业资源与区划,2023,44(6):206-217.
［17］晏志谦,孙锦杨,李建强.农户分化视角下宅基地退出方式选择影响因素分析［J］.中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(6):171-177.
［18］王坤鹏,欧名豪,刘成铭.就业分化视角下集中居住实施后农户的福利水平差异及影响因素研究：以扬州市为例［J］.地域研究与开发,2022,41(5):146-151.
［19］张婷,张安录,邓松林.期望收益、风险预期及农户宅基地退出行为：基于上海市松江区、金山区农户的实证分析［J］.资源科学,2016,38(8):1503-1514.
［20］胡银根,杨春梅,董文静,等.基于感知价值理论的农户宅基地有偿退出决策行为研究：以安徽省金寨县典型试点区为例［J］.资源科学,2020,42(4):685-695.
［21］叶剑锋,吴宇哲.宅基地制度改革的风险与规避：义乌市“三权分置”的实践［J］.浙江工商大学学报,2018(6):88-99.
［22］侯娇,卢新海,郑玮博,等.农户对宅基地流转福利的认同研究：以湖北省为例［J］.中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(6):194-202.
［23］黄建伟,张兆亮.农户行为理论分析框架下宅基地流转主体特征与影响因素的实证研究［J］.农村经济,2022(1):39-51.
［24］郑沃林,唐晓莲,谢昊,等.经济快速发展地区的宅基地使用权流转意愿度及影响因素研究：基于广州市的实证研究［J］.经济体制改革,2016(4):77-82.
［25］孙鹏飞,赵凯.权利保障、信息能力与农户宅基地退出政策满意度：基于安徽省金寨县335个农户样本［J］.农村经济,2020(9):42-50.
［26］杨丽霞,朱从谋,苑韶峰,等.基于供给侧改革的农户宅基地退出意愿及福利变化分析：以浙江省义乌市为例［J］.中国土地科学,2018,32(1):35-41.
［27］周小平,王情,谷晓坤,等.基于Logistic回归模型的农户宅基地置换效果影响因素研究：以上海市嘉定区外冈镇宅基地置换为例［J］.资源科学,2015,37(2):258-264.
［28］胡小芳,刘凌览,张越,等.新型城镇化中农村宅基地置换满意度研究：基于湖北省彭墩村的调查［J］.中国土地科学,2014,28(12):63-70.
［29］胡业翠,刘桂真,李静.移民安置区农户土地利用与生计变化研究［J］.中国土地科学,2016,30(10):29-36.
［30］王成超,杨玉盛.基于农户生计演化的山地生态恢复研究综述［J］.自然资源学报,2011,26(2):344-352.
［31］SOLTANI A,ANGELSEN A,EID T,et al.Poverty,Sustainability,and Household Livelihood Strategies in Zagros,Iran［J］.Ecological Economics,2012,79:60-70.
［32］WALKER R,PERZ S,CALDAS M,et al.Land Use and Land Cover Change in Forest Frontiers:The Role of Household Life Cycles［J］.International Regional Science Review,2002,25(2):169-199.
［33］ROBERTS M G,杨国安.可持续发展研究方法国际进展：脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较［J］.地理科学进展,2003,22(1):11-21.
［34］Department for International Development.Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets［R］.London:Department for International Development,2000:68-125.
［35］杨云彦,赵锋.可持续生计分析框架下农户生计资本的调查与分析：以南水北调(中线)工程库区为例［J］.农业经济问题,2009(3):58-65.
［36］郑沃林,田光明.农村建设用地低效利用的影响因素分析：以广州市天河区和白云区为例［J］.地域研究与开发,2016,35(6):104-108.
［37］苏芳,蒲欣冬,徐中民,等.生计资本与生计策略关系研究：以张掖市甘州区为例［J］.中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(6):119-125.
［38］赵雪雁.生计资本对农牧民生活满意度的影响：以甘南高原为例［J］.地理研究,2011,30(4):687-698.
［39］李小云,董强,饶小龙,等.农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用［J］.中国农村经济,2007(4):32-39.
［40］谢东梅.农户生计资产量化分析方法的应用与验证：基于福建省农村最低生活保障目标家庭瞄准效率的调研数据［J］.技术经济,2009,28(9):43-49.
PDF(526 KB)

104

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉